People infected with malaria who do not exhibit symptoms pose a hidden risk to infection control efforts, new research has shown.
Researchers from the Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration (IDRC), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (LSHTM), Radboud University Medical Centre, and University of California, San Francisco, found that asymptomatic children in the Uganda study were the biggest source of malaria parasites transmitted to mosquitoes. This could provide a new opportunity for control efforts by targeting this infectious reservoir.
The study was published in The Lancet Infectious Diseases.
A major global health threat
Malaria presents a major health threat globally, with 94% of cases on the African continent alone, according to the WHO World Malaria Report 2020. In 2019, there were an estimated 229 million cases of malaria worldwide.
The disease is passed to a human through the bite of an infected female Anopheles mosquito, causing infection with the parasite. The predominant and most deadly parasite, Plasmodium falciparum, accounts for over 75% of mortality worldwide and is highly prevalent in Uganda.
Malarial parasites depend on a life cycle in which they constantly move back and forth between humans and mosquitoes. Successfully interrupting transmission of the disease can involve clearing parasites from human ‘hosts’ using anti-malaria drugs.
The research team set out to investigate patterns of malaria infection in order to understand more about transmission in the area. The study involved two years of regularly testing more than 500 people for evidence of malaria parasites. The genetic make-up of parasites was determined, as well as their ability to infect mosquitoes.
The researchers found that individuals who were asymptomatic were unknowingly responsible for most mosquito infections in the study. People with symptomatic infections were responsible for less than 1% of mosquito infections and appeared to play a negligible role in sustaining transmission.
Children with asymptomatic malaria
School-age children, aged five to 15 years, were responsible for over half (59%) of the infectious reservoir, followed by the under-fives (26%) and people aged 16 and older (16%). Most notably, the researchers found just four children were linked to 60% of the infected mosquitoes studied.
Dr John Rek, Co-author from IDRC, said: “These findings are a real eye opener in the fight against malaria. We found that infections in school-age children drive malaria transmission. Some children harboured billions of malaria parasites in their bloodstream without experiencing symptoms.”
LSHTM co-author Professor Sarah Staedke said: “School-age children are an important reservoir of malaria parasites that could be easily targeted for control interventions, such as chemoprevention through intermittent preventive treatment.
“This would benefit individual children, may reduce malaria transmission, and could help sustain malaria gains if intense vector control measures are interrupted.”
Preventing rebounds of malaria
Understanding transmission among asymptomatic cases is particularly important in areas where malaria control has been successful, but there is a risk that malaria might resurge when control measures are relaxed or withdrawn. Asymptomatic children that keep malaria circulating at relatively low levels could be sufficient to cause infections to quickly rebound if control efforts are not maintained. In other parts of Uganda, when intense malaria control with indoor residual spraying was halted, infections rebounded within weeks.
Principal author Professor Teun Bousema, from Radboud University Medical Centre, said: “Our study demonstrates that, even when malaria appears under control, there is a reservoir of infected individuals who can sustain the spread of this deadly disease. Unless their infections are targeted, malaria can quickly return.”
Overall, the findings provide evidence that asymptomatic infections are an important source of onward transmission to mosquitoes. Many malaria infections that contribute to transmission are initially below the level detectable by conventional diagnostic tests, including microscopy and rapid diagnostic tests.
Although the findings are insightful, the study authors acknowledge limitations such as including the length of time between participant sample selection and mosquito feeds, meaning they did not routinely measure infectiousness in the first few weeks of asymptomatic infections. They also noted that trial participants had exceptionally good access to care, whereas in other settings people with symptomatic malaria infections might develop more transmissible infections if treatment is not administered quickly.
